Frank David Barranco, MD, was the lead surgeon for my wife’s brain surgery at Barrow Neurological Institute. Before the procedure, we were only informed of a 4-7% chance of complications and the possibility of an extended rehab stay. What we were never told was that the surgery could leave her in a coma, completely dependent on others for survival—unable to walk, eat, or even breathe on her own. These were not risks we were given the opportunity to consent to. Had we known the full extent of what could happen, we would have sought multiple opinions to make the most informed decision possible for her care.
My wife, Leilanie, is in her 40s, a devoted wife, and a loving mother to our four children, all under the age of 12. Before this surgery, she was active, engaged, and present in their lives. Now, because of the failures in her post-surgical care, my children are growing up without the care of their mother. They live in constant fear that she might choke to death on her own saliva… because she can no longer clear it herself. Instead of playing with their mother, they watch as I have to suction her airway daily just to keep her alive.
After surgery, an infarct was identified but dismissed as ‘insignificant.’ Shockingly, at no point during her 20+ days in the neuro critical care and intensive care units at Barrow was a single follow-up MRI performed. No structured approach was taken to ensure imaging was done to assess the full extent of her condition. Instead, she was later transferred over 300 miles from Arizona to Nevada without an MRI—and without any transition of care orders emphasizing the need for continuous imaging.
When complications persisted, Frank David Barranco, MD, did not take the initiative to contact doctors at the rehabilitation facility to ensure proper follow-up care. Instead, he left it to me, a non-medical professional, to coordinate the order for an MRI. In my opinion, this was a complete abandonment of responsibility.
To make matters worse, Frank David Barranco, MD, never once mentioned retirement during his time overseeing my wife’s care. Yet, immediately after I sent my demand letter to Barrow, he abruptly retired—just after being named a 2025 Top Doctor. If he was planning to retire, we should have been informed so we could have made an informed decision about whether to proceed with him as the surgeon. While I cannot say for certain why he chose to retire when he did, the timing raises serious questions.
Meanwhile, four months have passed, and neither Frank David Barranco, MD, Barrow, St. Joseph’s, nor Dignity Health have reached out to check on my wife, offer medical guidance, or assign a liaison to facilitate her care. Their silence has forced us to blindly guess how to manage her complex medical needs, increasing her risk of complications and delaying her recovery. A hospital’s duty to a patient does not end when they leave its doors—especially when the injuries were caused under its care.
Would you—or if your loved one was involved—want answers? Wouldn’t you want to know everything before making a life-altering decision? Wouldn’t you expect a surgeon to order an MRI of your or your loved one’s brain after major surgery and a documented infarct? In my view, providing the basic standard of care could have dictated a different outcome. Instead, we are left suffering. My children are forced to grow up with a mother who cannot care for them, and every single day, I live with the fear that she might not survive.
I have filed a lawsuit to hold them accountable, not just for their failures but for their refusal to take responsibility. Their silence is not just unethical—it is dangerous. Patients and their families deserve full disclosure, proper follow-up care, and the dignity of acknowledgment when things go wrong!
Read More