Dr. Scott is a Great Doctor. I know the papers are trying to make him look like a monster, and I bet the person who gave him a 1 star rating is not a patient and just going by what they are reading in the papers. First off, to become a patient of Dr. Scotts, you go to a Government Agency called People in Need. At this Agency you are evaluated to make sure you are not a drug addict, given a background check to make sure you were never convicted of a Drug offense, given a urine to make sure that you have no drugs in your system that shouldn't be there, and counceled about the pain medications and the risks of addiction. This all must be done before Dr. Scott will even consider taking the patient. Along with that, you need either a referal from another Dr. stating the patient needs Pain Management or have been in Pain Management prior. With all these precautions taking, how can he be to blame for prescribing to drug dependant people? Why don't they go after the people who were paid to… evaluate these people? After going through all that, Dr. Scott will then review the patients medical records, along with the findings at People in Need, and the referal, and will then decide whether he will see the patient or not. Once an appointment is made, if you were previously in Pain Management, you need to bring a printout of your prescription history with you to the appointment. Dr. Scott will then see the patients every 2 weeks for the first two months (if not longer) he sees you as a patient to monitor the patients better. He also makes ALL patients sign a Pain Management agreement that subjects the patients to random pill counts & random drug screens. If you are chosen for a random drug screening, you have one hour from the time you leave his office to get to People in Need again for the urine drug screening. After he decides to see the patient once a month, instead of every two weeks, he gives his patients the choice if they want to continue to get their prescriptions every two weeks or once a month, as I decided every two weeks was fine and I would imagine alot of his patients just stayed with two week supplies. This explains why he would have 60% more prescriptions then other doctors, because all the other doctors around here at least prescribe only month supplies, so if one doctor has 500 patients and writes a month supply and Dr. Scott has 500 patients and writes two week supplies, of course Dr. Scott is going to have more prescriptions written out. As far as Dr. Scott having 500 patients, as it says in the papers, which I think that number is probably including all the patients who have been discharged for pill counts or failed urine tests, but if Dr. Scott sees 30 patients a day, which is a low number for any Dr. to see in a day, times 4 days a week, that's 120 patients a week, times four weeks in a month, that's 480 patients right there. They also tried to make Dr. Scott look bad by saying he only accepts cash. The reason for this is also simple, he does not want to be told by an insurance company who does and doesn't need his services. He took auto insurances and other forms of insurance when he first came to the area, but after a few months, the insurance companies would call him and say that the people no longer needed pain management, so an insurance guy would be making a medical decision which is just wrong as far as I'm concerned. I don't blame him one bit for not wanting to deal with insurance companies. Dr. Scott DOES examine his patients every single visit. I have been in pain management for 13 years, and he examines me more every single visit than any other Dr. I've ever been to. He also makes all his patients go through some sort of physical therapies, preferably twice monthly. All his patients are expected to see the person of their choice one to two times a month for message therapy, physical therapy or chiropractic therapy. The only patients of his that don't have to do some sort of therapy is patients that another Doctor or Surgeon prohibit from being manipulated, or patients that have letters from other Doctors saying that none of those options of therapy would be beneficial to the patient. There is no law that limits the number of pills a doctor can write, so why they print that he is over prescribing is beyond me. That is matter of opinion, and if they can convict him on matter of opinion, then we are ALL in trouble. That's like one insurance guy writing a policy and another insurance guy saying that policy shouldn't have been written for that amount and the writer of the policy being charged because they didn't agree on the amount the policy was written for. It's all matter of opinion. Just because one doctor doesn't agree with the amount being prescribed doesn't mean 50 others won't agree with him, especially Pain Management Doctors that are not being paid by the DEA. I just don't know what more Dr. Scott could be expected to do, in my opinion he goes above and beyond with the precautions he takes. And I will say it again and again Dr. Scott is a VERY good man. I can't believe they want to condemn him because 11 of his patients were selling their meds. If it is true and he does have 509 patients, that's 2% of his patients. What about the other 98% of his patients? I'd be willing to bet that doctors that prescribe insulin have 2% of their patients selling their needles on the streets, or doctors that prescribe Viagra have way more than 2% of their patients selling their Viagra. So please, don't believe everything you read in the newspapers, or at least understand thats just one side of the story.
Read More