I came upon two reviews of this doctor that that brought to mind an old German term I had once came upon, it was called “Schadenfreude”, and no, it’s not a term to describe a German dish. It’s a term with variances associated with it but means the taking of pleasure in hurting others. It seems in today’s social and moral climate this has become our new norm. The reviews to which I refer to today are the ones that one patient wrote in their closing remarks as Dr. Meredith Warner being a knife happy surgeon and to stay away from her, and the other review of her by a patient claiming to be left in her evaluation room for several hours waiting to be dismissed and then having to leave the room and travel down a darken hallway.
It is not my intention to engage in dialogue that is in rebuttal to their statements per se, but rather to highlight my own experiences with Dr. Meredith Warner, as a former patient, and her capabilities as an Orthopedic Doctor and Surgeon. Allow me the opportunity… to state from the beginning that I am not here in the role as her vindicator or advocate, I am simply stating my experience, contrary to these two reviews so that you can make your own decision based upon the viewpoint of another person with direct experience with this doctor. My remarks to their reviews have caused a surprised moral dilemma to be drawn from within myself to stay silent or address those remarks that are contrary to things I know to be the truer facts of her professional capabilities only and not of her personality type.
She performed a difficult surgery, in 2014, on my foot from an injury I sustained during the course of my former employment. I was in the LSU Health System, a fine health care provider, but no one could come together to definitively address a treatment plan for injury to my right foot. By chance, my Nurse Practitioner informed me that she wanted to submit my case to a special program within the system that was manned by outside professional doctors in the community who were volunteering their time and talents to special cases, but were highly selective in the cases they accepted for review, and that I was a long shot for acceptance, but worth the try. I can state with certainty that this was the best long shot I ever got. Dr. Warner was my attending physician and the amount of thorough examination that she did, at this evaluation, I had never had done before. At that moment, I knew in my heart that my prospects for a good outcome for my foot injury had finally arrived. The more she kept asking me questions as she evaluated my foot only served to heightened my confidence in a successful surgery outcome for my injury. She was professional, direct and to the point, which I can see how someone might view as being aloft, but what I viewed as the professional hallmarks of a great and skilled doctor. From the time I entered as her patient until I was discharged I have not seen any reason to change my opinion of her professional capabilities as an orthopedic doctor, diagnostician, or surgeon.
So in closing, I want to draw your attention back to certain facts that originally put questions of doubt in my own mind about the two negative reviews above, starting with the first.
What brings suspicion to my mind is that if, as the reviewer claimed. Dr. Warner was a “knife happy” surgeon what would you do? What comes to my own mind would be to not be wasting my time sending negative reviews on a doctor to a website, instead I would be addressing my issues with the medical licensing board about her surgical capabilities, and yet nowhere in her review is this made mentioned of. And do you also suspect that if Dr. Warner was a “knife happy” surgeon, as this patient believed, that she would still be a practicing surgeon, or that she would have been trusted by one of our most prestigious specialty hospitals (Woman’s Hospital) in our community to be their Medical Director of Orthopedic care, allow me to answer the question for you with a resounding no. Or would the soldiers that she operated on in Afghanistan and Iraq would have deemed her a “knife happy” surgeon as opposed to a Guardian Angel, again I suspect not. Instead I think this is a circumstance like I mentioned earlier of a person with a “Schadenfreude” complex angry and hurtful to a doctor simply applying her knowledge, skill, and experience for the betterment of this patient. Surgeons routinely enter into a surgery and run into problems or complications not expected and must make knowledge based judgments that are simply performed for the patient’s successful outcome.
As far as the patient being left in a room for hours, it leaves me a little suspect also because it contradicts a basic human nature in all of us. If I am going to engage a doctor and not be shy about not following their order to not get an MRI, that they have recommended for my evaluation, I assure you that I am not going to have a problem whatsoever walking out of their exam room, after about waiting for twenty minutes for a discharge, I am simply leaving, even if they have not discharged me yet, much less stay in a room for several hours waiting to be discharged.
Folks, you do what you think best for your situation, but let me leave you with this thought. This doctor is recognized by professionals inside and outside the medical profession as being one of the select few ‘talented’ surgeons in our community, and doctors are people to just like you and I, with the same off days as you and I, but do you think for one minute that Dr. Meredith Warner would have the distinction that she has in our community if she was inferior in her abilities, or incapable in fulfilling her role as surgeon, just something to think about …
Robert Vince
Read More